IPAK

Research Spotlight: Phase 2 of the IPAK Vaxxed vs. Unvaxxed Study is Published

We are pleased to announce that Phase 2 of the IPAK "Vaxxed vs. Unvaxxed" Study was published following peer review. The study co-authors, Dr. Lyons-Weiler and his collaborator, Russell Blaylock, M.D.. addressed the following questions:

1. Which group of patients adhered to the regular well-child visit better, the vaccinated patients or those who had refused vaccines?

2. In groups of patients matched for health check visitation usage, which adverse health outcomes following vaccination differed between vaccinated patients and those who had refused vaccines?

3. After adjusting for health care visitations and age, do vaccines still have a significant influence on overall adverse health conditions in a manner that is independent of their interaction with routine healthcare visitations and age?

4. Did older patients in the practice who stopped vaccinating experience a decrease in the adverse health outcomes that have been attributed to vaccines?

The study results, which are provided in a paper entitled “Revisiting Excess Diagnoses of Illnesses and Conditions in Children Whose Parents Provide Informed Permission to Vaccination” show, among other surprises, that the unvaccinated families made their well-child visits with greater frequency than the vaccinated families.

The study also provides strong evidence that the elevated rates of office visits required for adverse health conditions are increased in the vaccinated patients in a manner that cannot be explained by healthcare-seeking behavior.

The study appears in the journal "International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Research,and Practice".  Peer review was blinded to the authors.

To help fund Phase 3, visit this link. or click the Donate Button below.

The Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge is a not-for-profit organization that exists to perform scientific research in the public interest. We use the principles and practices of scientific research to help individual researchers, research teams, consortia, and companies push their project through roadblocks, or map their way around them via evidence-based alternatives. We provide independent views and intellectual effort on scientific progress in three main areas:

• Helping investigators in their efforts to reduce human pain & suffering through biomedical and related forms of scientific research.
• Helping investigators increase their understanding of the universe using science as a way of knowing.
• Educating the public in robust and reliable advances in medicine and science.

Our activities are varied, and include:

• Conducting and publishing independent and objective nonpartisan analyses, studies, and research on legislative issues that impact public health and scientific progress in light of peer-reviewed and published scientific findings.
• Providing support in many forms to endeavors that advance understanding via science (publications, consortia, conferences).
• Providing support to progress in science in specific critical areas that are likely to reduce human pain and suffering - and we go the extra mile to help make those successes in translation happen.
• Voicing informed opinions and issues on select government agency and court rulings, and actions and positions taken by other government agencies that influence healthcare practice and affect public health.

IPAK: Bringing knowledge & people together in the pursuit of successes in research via progressive science.

IPAK is a not-for-profit organization funded by private donations from the public.

To learn more about IPAK, write to us.

IPAK is registered as a Domestic Not-For-Profit Organizations in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. We as in PHASE II of our application process for 501c3 status. You can help with your gift or donation!